A Preliminary Assessment of the
Glycemic Index of Honey
A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
by Dr Jayashree Arcot and Prof Jennie Brand-Miller
RIRDC Contact Details
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Level 1, AMA House
42 Macquarie Street
BARTON 2600
PO Box 4776
KINGSTON 2604
Phone: 02 6272 4819
Fax: 02 6272 5877
Email:
rirdc@rirdc.gov.au. Website:http://www.rirdc.gov.au
downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/index.htm
purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop
Foreword
In recent years scientists have been investigating the physiological responses (effect on blood sugar levels) to food, particularly the effects of different carbohydrate containing foods. Honey has been classified to be a food containing simple sugars and this has several implications on the choice of foods for diabetics.
Glycemic Index factor is a ranking of foods based on their overall effects on blood sugar levels. The source of honey decided the sugar and acid composition of honey which can show differences in the GI factor. Little or no information exists on the GI of honey and in particular no information exists on the differences in the GI of different honey varieties.
The quantitative measurement of organic acid and carbohydrate composition of different floral varieties would therefore enable the study of GI of honey, and lead the way to understanding whether or not all types of honey should be classified as one type of food for people with Diabetes.
RIRDC has been able to facilitate this study by providing the funding for this project. This report discusses the sugar and acid composition of six floral varieties of honey, namely Red Gum, Salvation Jane, Ironbark, Yellow Box, Stringybark and Yapunyah and two commercialblends obtained in 2001, and their effects on the blood glucose response in humans.
The Glycemic Index
The Glycemic Index (GI) is a physiologically based method used to classify carbohydrate foods according to their blood glucose-raisingpotential.
The Glycemic Index measures the area under the glycemic response curve during a 2-hour period after consumption of a 50g carbohydrate serve from a test food, with values being expressed relative to the effect of either white bread or glucose.
Table 12. The Glycemic Index (GI) of foods
Low Glycemic Index (<55)GI | Moderate Glycemic Index (56-69)GI | High Glycemic Index (>70)GI |
Bread 41Heavy mixed grain 30-45Breakfast cerealsAll Bran 42
Toasted muesli 43 Psyllium-based processed cereal 42 Dairy foods Milk, full fat 27 Milk, skim 32 Yoghurt, low fat, fruit 33 Confectionery Chocolate (Dove) 45 M&Ms 33 Snickers Bar 41 Fruits Apple 36 Orange 43 Peach 28 Legumes Lentils 28 Soybeans 18 Baked Beans     48 |
            57Barley bread                                     65Rye bread                                          65Breakfast cereals
Cream of wheat                               66 Muesli                                                 66 Dairy foods Ice cream, full fat                            61 Confectionery Mars Bar                                           65 Fruits Pineapple                                           52 Pawpaw                                             58 Rices                                             50-60(high amylose varieties, e.g. basmati) Honey (blended Australian)           58 |
BreadsWhite bread                         70Wholemeal bread               72French bread                       95Breakfast cereals
Cornflakes                           84 Rice Bubbles                       82 Potatoes                      80-100 Confectionery Jelly beans                            80 Life Savers                           70 Fruits Watermelon                         72 Rices                               70-90(low amylose, white or brown) Honey (blended not Australian) 87 |
Reference food is Glucose = 100
Source: Brand-Miller, J and Foster-Powell, K. (1999)
The International Tables of Glycemic Index lists honey as having a Glycemic Index of either 58 or 87 (Powel et. al., 1995). The Glycemic Index of 58 is an Australian blended honey (Brand-Miller, 1995).
Test Foods
Table 13. The weight (g) and sugar content (g) of the test portion of the reference food and honeys
Food | Portionsize | Av.Carbohydrate | Fructose | Glucose | Sucrose | Maltose |
Reference food | 25 gglucose 250mL water | 25.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Commercial.Blend 1 | 49.6 | 25.0 | 13.6 | 15.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
CommercialBlend 2 | 35.6 | 25.0 | 13.6 | 10.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
Iron Bark | 41.7 | 25.0 | 14.1 | 9.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Red Gum | 33.9 | 25.0 | 11.7 | 11.2 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
SalvationJane | 40.6 | 25.0 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Stringy bark | 30.4 | 25.0 | 15.9 | 8.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Yapunya | 36.9 | 25.0 | 15.5 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
GI Testing
Figure 2. The average plasma insulin response curves for the reference food and the four honeys tested in the first part of the study, depicted as the change in blood insulin concentration from the fasting baseline level
Figure 3. The average plasma glucose response curves for the reference food and the five honeys tested in the second part of the study, depicted as the change in glucose concentration from the fasting baseline level.
Recommendation
The low GI honeys such as Yellow Box, Stringybark, Red Gum, Iron Bark, Yapunyah and the moderate GI honeys such as Commercialblend #2 and Salvation Jane can be marketed by stating in their promotional materials that the GI values of the honeys were measuredusing valid scientific methodology through this project.
The values should be published in relevant GI publications particularly in the future editions of
Brand-Miller’s books about the GI (The GI Factor series) which will be appropriately referenced
Finally there may be more floral varieties of honey that need to be tested. One question that needs further research is any pure floralhoney low GI? For example, is any Yellow Box honey low GI?
Final Thought
While we diabetics might think that we can therefore eat these honey my local honey man says that honey from the some source can vary from year top year and even season to season. He believes that a lot of research needs to be done before we can use these honeys with confidence. If you read the full report this is acknowledged by the researcher.
My advice is that you test your own reaction to these honeys and if you are affected remove honey from your diet. Experienced diabetics will know if they are affected by the way you feel.
I have tried to present this scientific study by showing the results in a way that I hope most can understand. If you have that kind of mind, you can read the full report by following the links provided at the beginning of the page.
I have used Yellow box honey instead of sugar in my bread making and I have been very pleased with the result. Both in taste and body reaction.